Fear and Anxiety
Perhaps, in your last lecture, you were referring to the most scattered and unsatisfactory details of the usual panic. I know this and I think you were most shocked. I did not mention the anxiety, about which most anxious people have complained and stated the biggest cause of distress. It can reach a level that can lead to wild companies. But in this case, I do not want to be less than you expect. I hope that instead you will deal with the problem of restless people in the right way and solve it.
Fear does not require
self-introduction; Everyone knows or, in particular, who is affected at some
stage. I think we never seriously thought about why the nerves have suffered
the most in this condition. Maybe that was it. The terms "panic" and
"horror" are often confused as if they were meant to be. Frightened
people are not frightened and nervous people who are symptomatic patients but
who do not face anxiety. This is unreasonable. But the problem
of fear is certainly a point of many major issues, which can shed a flow of
light on psychological life in its entirety.
I am not saying that I can offer you this complete solution, but you would expect that psychiatric diagnosis would be dealt with in a way other than medical schools. These schools appear to be primarily involved in the physical cause of terrorism. The patient learns that he is suffering from nervous breakdown and his medulla oblongata is disturbed. A serious, beautiful image printing module. I remember how long and how hard it was to study it. Fear can be talked about for a long time without adding to the panic. If I call this real fear the opposite of nervous fear, you will understand me without much persuasion. The real fear seems wise and understandable to us. We can testify that this response has been predicted and is expected to be interpreted as an external risk, meaning that the flight is like a reflex and is thought to be an example of self-preservation.
As a result, the
objects and conditions that give rise to fear can be determined primarily
through our experience and sense of overcoming the outside world. We value the
fact that the savage is afraid of a cannon or an eclipse, while the white man,
who can hold the device and predict the event. Most of the time, high intelligence
creates anxiety when it anticipates danger ahead of time. With
further consideration, we must recognize that our decisions on real terrorism,
whether logical or objective, need to be extensively updated. After taking a
cold look at a person's own strengths against the severity of the threat, and
then deciding whether the flight, safety, or even attack will be a cause for
happiness. Fear has no role in such situations. Whatever
happens is completed closer and faster without the emergence of fear. You know that
excessive fear is ineffective and paralyzes all behavior, including flight.
Generally, when faced with danger, people respond with a combination of fear
and resistance. The frightened, frightened animal ran away. In this case,
though, the driving force is not anxiety, but flight.
As a result, we may be
inclined to claim that terrorism never increases deliberately. A closer look
may reveal more information about the state of anxiety. The first aspect is
fear of dangers, which manifests as increased sensory awareness and motor
stress. This expectation is undoubtedly beneficial. Its absence will have
significant implications. On the one hand, it causes motor movement, primarily
flight, and in high-altitude aircraft, active defense. On the other hand, it causes
what we call terror. I refrain from going into the debate of
whether our language means the same or different things through words of
anxiety, fear or dread. I believe that anxiety is used in connection with a
situation regardless of the purpose, while fear is mainly towards something.
Fear, on the other hand, really has a special meaning, emphasizing the effects
of a threat that ends without any expectation or preparation for fear. In this
way we can say that anxiety saves man from fear and panic.
You may have noticed
ambiguity and ambiguity in the use of the word "anxiety". One usually
means a subjective state that leads to the feeling that the "evolution of
fear" is over. Such a condition can be called emotions. What is an emotion
in the dynamic sense? Of course, there is a lot going on here.
Emotions include unlimited motor stimuli or discharges, as well as a specific
stimulus, which is divided into two types: the experience of pre-completed
motor functions, and an immediate sense of pleasure and discomfort, which
Presents the effect of what we call its loud voice. However, I am not convinced
that these figures capture the true essence of the feeling. We have gained a
better understanding of some of the emotions and discovered that the thread
that connects such a complex is a copy of an important event.
This may be a general
impression of the general type, which is related to the ancient past of the
race rather than the individual. Specifically, the state of mind resembles a
found attack. This is the result of a reminder. The hysterical attack is
therefore synonymous with a newly formed human emotion, a natural emotion from
the globally recognized hysteria. Don't think that what I
have said about emotions here is derived from general psychology. On the contrary,
they are concepts that have grown up with and are only at home in psychology.
What psychologists want to say about emotions, such as James-Lange theory, is
completely incomprehensible to us psychologists, and cannot be discussed.
Naturally, we do not
take very certainty in our awareness of feelings, it is an effort to orient
yourself in the obscure area. To continue: We think we recognize the initial
feeling that the fear emotion repeats. We believe that it is birth itself that
brings together the complex of traumatic emotions, a discharge of desires, and
physical stimuli that has become the template for the impact of
life-threatening risk, and which is replicated within us as a state of terror
ever after.
At that time, the first fear was the excessive increase in irritability by blocking air flow (internal respiration), so it was toxic. Fear, the word anxiety, emphasizes the suffocating quality of the breath, which was the result of a real condition at the time and which now resonates almost permanently in all emotions. We also realize how important it is that this first state of fear appeared during the separation from the mother. We assume, however, that the proclivity to replicate the first state of terror has been so profoundly rooted in biology by countless centuries that no one can avoid the sensation of fear. Even theologian McDoff, who was "cut off from his mother's womb" and therefore did not undergo self-birth, does not claim to have experienced self-birth. We don't know how other mammals create a fear state, because we don't know the complex movement of emotions that equates to our fear in them.
Maybe you'll find it
interesting to learn how I came to think that birth is the genesis and
blueprint of the fear emotions. The smallest part of it is speculation; I
borrowed it from the people's native way of thinking. Many years before, after
an assistant at the Obstetrics clinic told us a nice account of what took place
in the last test for women, we had a dinner table - a variety of young doctors.
One applicant was asked what it meant if the baby's foeces were present in
water discharge during birth and she immediately replied "the infant is
frightened." She's been laughing and "flunked." But
I quietly took part in it and began to suspect that the poor woman of the
people had shown an important connection with the right impression.
What are its signs and
circumstances now as we proceed to neurotic fear? There's a lot to explain.
Firstly, we see a general state of worry, a condition for free-flowing fear
which is ready for any appropriate idea, for decision, for hopes, for the sake
of making itself felt. We name this "expected apprehension" or
"expected anticipation." Individuals suffering from this kind are
still predicting the most awful possibilities, interpreting each coincidence as
a bad odor and giving all confusion a terrible sense. We
accuse them of being overly anxious or frustrated. An amazing range of
anticipated fear is characteristic of a neurological condition that I call
"anxiety neurosis," and in which I group with real neuroses.
second type of fear is
mentally more limited and connected to specific things or events, in contrast
to what we have just mentioned. It is the terror of many phobias which is also
very strange. Stanley Hall has recently taken the trouble to introduce the
excellent Greek words of American psychology to the whole series of such
phobias. Ten Egyptian afflictions, except that there are more than 10, sounds
like a list. Just listen to something that could be the center of the contents
of the phobia.
Outdoor darkness, open
checkpoints, fur, rock, snakes, mice, thunderstorms, sharp squares, blood,
captivity areas, crowds, loneliness, crossing bridges, land and sea travel,
etc. The initial attempt at guidance leads to division. Three classes in this
mess. In some horrible things and situations for the common people there is
often something terrible, dangerous and similarly, even if their intensity is
exaggerated, they are not insignificant to us. For example, in the eyes of a
snake, most of us experience a sense of retreat.
There is a third group
of phobias that is not fully understood by us. When a strong, mature man is
afraid to cross the street or square of his hometown, when a healthy,
well-developed woman faints from fear because a cat has wiped her band of
clothes or A rat has entered. Room We How do we establish a relationship with
risk that is clearly under phobia? In phobias caused by these animals, it is
not possible to question the height of normal human antipathies.
Because there are some
people who can't feed a cat without naming it and as an example of malice. At
the same time, the name of a first class pet is the mouse, which makes women
very scared. A lot of baby girls who were happy to see the name of this boyfriend,
screaming, looking at the little creatures. The actions of a man who is only
afraid to cross a street or a square can be described only by the claim that he
behaves like a little boy. In fact, a child is tutored to prevent such a
dangerous incident, and if anyone walks with him or her across the square or
driveway, our agorphobist actually gets away with it.
Identified two types of
fear, free-floating terrorism and fear.Bound by phobia, they are different. The
former does not evolve better than the latter. It only happens in rare cases at
the same time, almost coincidentally. Phobias do not have to show the strongest
state of general anxiety, and people who are stopped all day because of
agorphobia can be free of depressed expectations. Some phobias develop only in
later childhood, such as fear of squares or trains, while some, fear of the
dark, fear of nature or animals remain from the beginning.
The third form of
neurotic terrorism presents us with an underclass: we lose the connection
between fear and imminent danger. This anxiety, for example, is caused by the
excitement through which we expect an emotional manifestation, but regardless
of the most terrifying, or some known situation, that is understandable to both
us and the patient. Is out of reach, even in such a state of excitement .
We can't find a threat
or a cause that has spread to such an extent, no matter how close or close we
look. We learn from these random attacks that the complexity of what we call
fear can be broken down into important parts of it. Symptoms of this whole
attack can be similar to the symptoms described with the same intensity as
dizziness, lightheadedness, or shortness of breath. The way we usually
understand fear can be completely absent or indefinite. However, these
disorders, which we call "alternatives to anxiety," are similar to
those of medical and etiological concern.
There are two concerns?.
Is it possible to compare nervous fear, in which the threat can be countered
with real fear with a slight or absence, which is always the response to the
threat? What can we reduce by nervous fear? At this point, we would like to
live up to our expectations: "There must be a reason for fear."
Hopeful dread or general uneasiness is firmly associated with specific cycles in sexual life, let us say with particular kinds of moxie. Under these conditions lustful fervor vanishes and tension has its spot. The wary interference of the sexual demonstration, when drilled as the standard sexual system, so often causes the uneasiness anxiety in men, and particularly in ladies. The more unpredictable the lady, the more she will respond to the feebleness of the man, or to the copulation interruptus, by nervousness signs. The choice whether sickness is to result consistently relies on the quantitative elements, says Dr. Gerson. The conduct of ladies whose sexual lead is uninvolved, viz., is controlled by the treatment of the spouse, repudiates this speculation, he says. In sedative or just marginally libidiny ladies, such abuse won't convey such outcomes, he adds. The specialist adds. Sexual forbearance, suggested so heartily by the doctors of to-day, has similar importance in the improvement of states of uneasiness just when the charisma is adequately solid and not generally represented by sublimation, says Gerson, . The doctor adds. Indeed, even where character development and not sickness is concerned, we effectively perceive that sexual imperative goes connected at the hip with a specific uneasiness.
In certain states of
energy we may notice the combination of uneasiness and moxie, and the last
replacement of tension for drive. Exactly how tension starts from the moxie we
don't have the foggiest idea; we can just find out that the Libido is in
suspension, and that we notice uneasiness in its place. The effect on the
improvement of hypochondriac dread of specific periods of life, like pubescence
and the time of menopause, has a place here as well.
2. We gather a second clue from the
examination of the psychoneuroses, particularly of insanity. We have heard that
notwithstanding the indications, dread habitually goes with this condition;
this, nonetheless, is free skimming dread, which is showed either as an assault
or turns into a lasting condition. The patients can't determine what they fear and
associate their dread, through an unquestionable auxiliary elaboration, with
fears closest nearby; passing, madness, loss of motion. At the point when we
dissect the circumstance which offered ascend to the tension or to side effects
joined by it, we can for the most part tell which ordinary psychologic measure
has been discarded and has been supplanted by the wonder of dread. Allow me to
communicate it in an unexpected way: we remake the oblivious interaction like
it had not experienced concealment and had proceeded with its way into
awareness uninterruptedly. Under these conditions too this interaction would
have been joined by a feeling, and we currently learn with shock that when
concealment has happened the feeling going with the typical cycle has been
supplanted by dread, paying little heed to its unique quality. In hysteric
states of dread, its oblivious correlative might be either a motivation of
comparative character, like dread, disgrace, shame or positive lustful
excitation, or antagonistic and forceful feeling like rage or fury. Dread at
that point is the normal money for which all passionate motivations can be
traded, given that the thought which it has been related has been dependent
upon concealment.
3. Patients experiencing impulsive demonstrations
are astoundingly without dread. They yield us the information for our third
point. On the off chance that we attempt to obstruct them in the presentation
of their habitual demonstrations, of their washing or their ceremonials, or on
the off chance that they, at the end of the day, set out to surrender one of
their impulses, they are seized with horrendous dread that again claims
submission to the impulse. We comprehend that the enthusiastic demonstration
had hidden dread and had been performed uniquely to maintain a strategic
distance from it. In impulse anxiety at that point, dread, which would somehow
or another be available, is supplanted by indication improvement. Comparable
outcomes are yielded by madness. Following the interaction of concealment we
discover the turn of events, both of nervousness alone or of uneasiness and
side effect advancement, or at last a more complete manifestation improvement
and no tension. From a theoretical perspective, at that point, it is right to
say that manifestations are shaped uniquely to avoid improvement of dread,
which in any case couldn't be gotten away. As indicated by this origination,
dread apparently occupies the focal point of the stage in the issues of
hypochondria.
0 Comments